🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to safeguard females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence comparable debates in other EU countries